16 Comments
User's avatar
John Brophy's avatar

Interesting. Seems like this was somewhat of a damp squid. Even an exercise in appeasement - look we are doing something. The death jabs need to be pulled from the market asap. The mRNA platform is an experimental gene therapy that never would have been rolled out without a manufactured crisis. If this is not the priority then all the bla bla is just that.

Expand full comment
Louise Roseingrave's avatar

The clue is in the title. Benefit must outweigh risk. I'm hopeful.

Expand full comment
The Phantom Honker's avatar

Thanks for the report Louise, hopefully enough of those affected adversely respond, as its probably going to be the sheer weight of numbers that gets any momentum on this.

There are plenty of people who are vaccine injured who fail to either recognise it through ignorance or ignore it due to denial. Those people need to be on board.

"Long Covid" needs to be acknowledged as vaccine harm, it's appears to only affect those who received the injection.

Thanks again.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

Exactly, they are being told by their gp that they have " long covid " when in fact it's most likely vax injury.

Expand full comment
Louise Roseingrave's avatar

There are disability payments (scheme extended last week) for "Long Covid" but no such thing for v injuries so you can see what's happening here ££

Expand full comment
Stephen  Sutton's avatar

I remember warning friends and family at the time about this very thing. If they were to suffer an adverse reaction they could likely be fighting for years through the courts and it may be something severe that meant you were unable to work. This is precisely what is being mooted here. They told us the benefit outweighed the risk, but if they told lies, it might take 10 years and hundreds of thousands of euros to prove it. Any compensation would not even make a minuscule dent in the profit margins of the likes of Pfizer, in fact they would have a specific pot of money allocated for it as adverse effects are common across the board with drugs, but of course we know this was different entirely, proving it is the difficult part when you have a team of ‘experts’ in the HSE, NPHET and elsewhere who would likely be willing to testify to absolve their own guilt. It’s a tragedy beyond words, I haven’t been able to give this topic too much of my time the past year or so. I think I’m still traumatised.

Expand full comment
jer Savage's avatar

At this stage anyone working & benefitting from selling chemicals to thd public for health reasons has to be a subject for extreme doubt. With regard to so called vxxines the removal of liability free ststus from these chemical injection behemoths must be removed, removed from us taxpayers & transferred where it rightly belongs & that is to the same behemoths, the profit takers & recipients of the billions generated by marketing under extreme pressure by government & so called "health agencies". We are providing them with free insurance. Ther R no consequences for them if they get it wrong. So - profit & turnover is their only motivation. A situation that will always b taken advantage of - when the shareholder interests are inscribed as the premier driving force- by law.

Anyone so working in that sector is dependent on it's continuation & growth.

Enuff said.

Expand full comment
Charles Foster Kane's avatar

With all this talk about vaccine injured, does anyone stop to think for even ONE second about the suffering of shareholders? Just look at this tragic Pfizer report. https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/06/01/terrible-news-for-pfizer-stock-investors/ The whole bloody yacht is sinking.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

Poor phizer and their shareholders but as they stated in the article you kindly shared they now will focus on " cancer" meds.

So they basically cause the cancer by putting the SV40 cancer causing ingredient into the shots but then offer the " cure". Win, win all around for phizer and their shareholders.

Expand full comment
Charles Foster Kane's avatar

It may well be a mass genocide, but let's look on the bright side- It'll save the planet, right?

Expand full comment
Katherine's avatar

Thank you for this important post!

Expand full comment
Elizabeth's avatar

Oh but Antou most certainly did offer to bus or transport people to get their shots as I myself saw the fb posts. Also I'm actually surprised only 50 people were at this meeting. People seem so brainwashed that even when they know their illness or their family members , friends, neighbours suffered sudden ,unexpected death after taking it they still are in denial. Until such time people accept the actual fact that they have been injured by these shots then nothing will change anywhere.

Expand full comment
rowena roche's avatar

Roy Butler's family should sue the Irish State for going against EU Guideline and stating AT THE TIME HE TOOK IT TO TRAVEL...AS PER AD CAMPAIGNS HERE LYING TO 'ENCOURAGE VACCINATION' - for LYING to the youth of Ireland to PERSUADE them to be vaccinated....they broke the law...easier to get them by playing that game...and go thru the European Court of Human Rights.....

Expand full comment
rowena roche's avatar

The audacity of Aontú bitch to say young people like Roy Butler took it to travel....the Irish government lied as he never needed it to travel at that time....

Expand full comment
rowena roche's avatar

In many ways, they have a gall to contact 100,000 people to 'ascertain reasons why they didn't take dose 2'....kinda obvious they had some reaction to stop them taking dose 2...or they died....

Expand full comment
Tommy's avatar

Would be interested to see how they are going to determine if someone is vaccine injured. Will there be a test or protocol? I forget the name of the protocol you mentioned before. Bukhart was it? Id guess they will do all they can to avoid using that since it could be used to verify deaths by the jab too and that would snowball fast

Expand full comment