There are legitimate reasons why those in the health professions would question 'Covid vaccine requirements'. A recent article from the Irish context is below (paywall should be removed soon as it’s Open Access): https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02610183231174846
Thank you for reporting on this, Louise. It is beyond belief that this is the kind of treatment that someone with a different opinion from the accepted 'official' narrative has to endure. Not once do those "trying" Ms Stack Rivas, pause to consider the possibility that THEY or their superiors could have got something wrong. Apparently, they are infallible. No room for argument or consideration of facts - just blind compliance and zero due diligence.
Another example of the modern Cancel Culture, anyone who doesn't agree with the narrative is cancelled. Masking a childs face is pure cruelty, and how can a child relate to a faceless adult. This must stunt a childs growth, trust, confidence etc, not to mention the effects on health. The people condoning this madness are heartless cruel people. God bless this Rmwoman for her courage in the face of this relentless propeganda, and that's all it is. She has the best interests of innocent children at heart.
Unscientific to say that masks are damaging children? This is as bad as the McGinty coroner saying it was "disingenuous" to submit information gleaned "from the internet".
These pathetic examples of so-called medical professionals running the show are choosing to live in a fantasy land of their minds own creation, and they believe the rest of us must indulge them with their fantasy. It makes the blood boil. We'll hold them all accountable, and the longer this "disingenuous" "unscientific" charade goes on, the worse it will be for them.
Hi Louise, this is very easily refuted. I'll take it you have pointed physio in right direction or let me know. There are plenty of people that can help.
Two words for Ms. Hanlon regarding masks.
COCHRANE REPORT.
There are legitimate reasons why those in the health professions would question 'Covid vaccine requirements'. A recent article from the Irish context is below (paywall should be removed soon as it’s Open Access): https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/02610183231174846
It is one big club and we ain't in it .
Thank's Louise
Welcome.
Thank you for reporting on this, Louise. It is beyond belief that this is the kind of treatment that someone with a different opinion from the accepted 'official' narrative has to endure. Not once do those "trying" Ms Stack Rivas, pause to consider the possibility that THEY or their superiors could have got something wrong. Apparently, they are infallible. No room for argument or consideration of facts - just blind compliance and zero due diligence.
Another example of the modern Cancel Culture, anyone who doesn't agree with the narrative is cancelled. Masking a childs face is pure cruelty, and how can a child relate to a faceless adult. This must stunt a childs growth, trust, confidence etc, not to mention the effects on health. The people condoning this madness are heartless cruel people. God bless this Rmwoman for her courage in the face of this relentless propeganda, and that's all it is. She has the best interests of innocent children at heart.
Unscientific to say that masks are damaging children? This is as bad as the McGinty coroner saying it was "disingenuous" to submit information gleaned "from the internet".
These pathetic examples of so-called medical professionals running the show are choosing to live in a fantasy land of their minds own creation, and they believe the rest of us must indulge them with their fantasy. It makes the blood boil. We'll hold them all accountable, and the longer this "disingenuous" "unscientific" charade goes on, the worse it will be for them.
Hi Louise, this is very easily refuted. I'll take it you have pointed physio in right direction or let me know. There are plenty of people that can help.
P
Well it's an inquiry and that's the evidence concluded but perhaps you'll post up what you have here Peter?