The best reason to avoid the jab is that it is medically valueless. If I, as a non-medically qualified person, can figure this out anyone can.
Far more sinister are the medics who push this stuff when they must realise what I found out. Even worse are those who continue to promote it after seeing the devastating effects it has on some of their patients.
And if they can't make a direct connection, surely the precautionary principle would dictate suspending the jabs - especially given that they are useless anyway!
given your work on this and other cases do you think that the widespread publication of reporting on issues such as this is difficult? More difficult that it should be?
The best reason to avoid the jab is that it is medically valueless. If I, as a non-medically qualified person, can figure this out anyone can.
Far more sinister are the medics who push this stuff when they must realise what I found out. Even worse are those who continue to promote it after seeing the devastating effects it has on some of their patients.
And if they can't make a direct connection, surely the precautionary principle would dictate suspending the jabs - especially given that they are useless anyway!
One would think that logic should prevail, but it appears to be in short supply, everywhere.
Hi Louise
given your work on this and other cases do you think that the widespread publication of reporting on issues such as this is difficult? More difficult that it should be?