I find the remarks by Harkin most interesting. Because he said that Dr. Billy is not being judged on his medical abilities.
I can’t see how they can possibly strike him off on what has gone on so far. And it’s also interesting that more information is coming out here than the IMC might like or the Government either.
Prof. Dalgliesh is superb and I think Dr. Clair Craig will also be superb.
I hope my reading of the case is accurate because I think it would be a complete travesty of justice if any punitive action were taken.
I think it’s appalling the massive psychological pressure put on this excellent Doctor!
I've been informed & provided with details of a company of which Mr dagleish is a research director called onyvax - its mission is to use vxxines to tackle cancer. He also apparently advocated the dispense of the experimental chemical injection to the younger age groups- back in the dark night. (No dawn yet mind U)
I'm sure he has since seen the error of his ways !!
Thanks for a great update. These are interesting and revealing exchanges. Probably better in hindsight that Dr. Clair Craig will weigh in on the 18th as she gets some time to reflect on the line of questioning which Prof. Dalgleish had to deal with.
For me the kicker was the Chair’s response to the Professor’s assertion about the Mail’s editor being censored. A simple «Okay». Are you serious? That should be game over. Nobody on the panel wants to touch this claim - it is radioactive.
Hence the anti Ivermectin stance. I knew that as soon as i 'investigated' IVM w a simple Google( !) search after people like Pierre Kory and others had spoken about it online.
Never mind that 3 billion(!)IVM dosis had been prescribed for humans w a safety record better than Paracetamol, it needed to be killed off to indeed push the jabs. It was so clear. Journalism was never the same again. Idem for anything in regards to Climate ( change).
And very quickly IVM became simply horse medicine and something that could make people go blind! And the put down of people even daring to mention it, abusing them, laughing at them as if they were the most stupid of all. Again: 2 minutes of a Google search wouldve told them!
This is utterly fascinating to read.
I find the remarks by Harkin most interesting. Because he said that Dr. Billy is not being judged on his medical abilities.
I can’t see how they can possibly strike him off on what has gone on so far. And it’s also interesting that more information is coming out here than the IMC might like or the Government either.
Prof. Dalgliesh is superb and I think Dr. Clair Craig will also be superb.
I hope my reading of the case is accurate because I think it would be a complete travesty of justice if any punitive action were taken.
I think it’s appalling the massive psychological pressure put on this excellent Doctor!
Thanks, Louise. It’s a long and winding road.
The accusers are so ridiculous, it’s difficult to listen to them. The debasement of language, meaning, science and justice writ large. Pitiful.
Thanks to Dr. Ralph and his fellow-persecuted.
I've been informed & provided with details of a company of which Mr dagleish is a research director called onyvax - its mission is to use vxxines to tackle cancer. He also apparently advocated the dispense of the experimental chemical injection to the younger age groups- back in the dark night. (No dawn yet mind U)
I'm sure he has since seen the error of his ways !!
Ya he talks about that (quoted)
Will look up 'onyvax' thanks for that info
Thanks for a great update. These are interesting and revealing exchanges. Probably better in hindsight that Dr. Clair Craig will weigh in on the 18th as she gets some time to reflect on the line of questioning which Prof. Dalgleish had to deal with.
For me the kicker was the Chair’s response to the Professor’s assertion about the Mail’s editor being censored. A simple «Okay». Are you serious? That should be game over. Nobody on the panel wants to touch this claim - it is radioactive.
Greetings from Donegal. Excellent articles. Many thanks!!😊
Hence the anti Ivermectin stance. I knew that as soon as i 'investigated' IVM w a simple Google( !) search after people like Pierre Kory and others had spoken about it online.
Never mind that 3 billion(!)IVM dosis had been prescribed for humans w a safety record better than Paracetamol, it needed to be killed off to indeed push the jabs. It was so clear. Journalism was never the same again. Idem for anything in regards to Climate ( change).
And very quickly IVM became simply horse medicine and something that could make people go blind! And the put down of people even daring to mention it, abusing them, laughing at them as if they were the most stupid of all. Again: 2 minutes of a Google search wouldve told them!
My own family. Intelligent people..