There is no "pharmaceutical test"

There is a set of protocols at autopsy.

I’ve spent the weekend attempting to clear my name after an unusual attack via a slanderous ‘livestream’ broadcasted on the internet on Friday night.

I’ve come round to the idea now that while the presentation is inept and devoid of proper research, O’Doherty’s discovery of my work may be no bad thing.

As regular readers already know, this reporter does not engage in petty squabbling. Over the past three years, I’ve simply kept the head down and worked away quietly, not interested in the limelight, but deeply invested in the outcome.

The result is that my reporting on this platform is methodical, technical, detailed and basically bullet proof. It has to be that way of course, as any discerning reader will understand. The result is underwhelming. I am fully aware. This content is not salacious, juicy, dramatic, headline-grabbing or sensationalist. It is written for the that rare phenomenon nowadays - the reader still equipped of the use of their God-given intelligence.

All those that know me and are familiar with my writing, know that I generally keep a low-profile. I am not interested in issuing rants on the internet. I am not interested in pigeon-holing myself into echo chambers. I am not interested in courting or cajoling readers.

I am interested in doing the work.

In her dubious presentation, O’Doherty states that I promote a “pharmaceutical test” that can show if someone is vaccine injured – I say no such thing.

O’Doherty states this test is a pharmaceutical product made by Roche – I say no such thing.

O’Doherty states that I want to use this test to bring about the ‘end of inquests’ for families seeking justice – I say no such thing.

In plain English, the question asked of the Pfizer Vaccines Director at the inquest into the death of Joseph McGinty, was:

“Is there any test or protocol or series of tests that could have been carried out that could definitively rule in or out the vaccine as a cause of death?" (Michael O’Connor, Senior Counsel for the McGinty family)

The answer given by the Pfizer representative was:

“I'm not aware of any test but I am not a pathologist so I don’t think it’s appropriate for me to comment on that,” (Dr Gillian Ellsbury, Pfizer’s Vaccine’s Director)

These facts are clear.

There is no ‘pharmaceutical test’ as O’Doherty erroneously claims.

There is a process of immunohistochemistry staining at autopsy, conducted on tissue samples from affected organs. For example, Joseph McGinty suffered brain swelling, this is confirmed at autopsy.

The brain tissue would then be examined through immunohistochemistry staining – a process that is done routinely at autopsy. It happens in laboratories all over the country, every day.

The difference, in applying Dr Arne Burckhardt’s specific protocols at autopsy, is that spike protein produced by the mRNA present in Covid 19 vaccines can be detected.

The detection process requires a specific antigen.

The antigen is commercially available.

One of the commercial providers of the antigen is the pharmaceutical company Roche. This detail regarding Roche, arose from contact with the lab in Germany, during the course of research into how this process might take place.

These are the facts, folks.

They have not changed since I wrote about them here, here and here.

Nor have the facts changed since I spoke to Aisling O’Loughlin on her show.

The facts do not change, even when Gemma O’Doherty arrives to misrepresent them and corrupt them in the manner that allows her to attempt to damage the work of this Substack, and in doing so, this reporter’s good name.

I can only present the facts to you, the reader, as I have done, throughout my career in journalism and for the past year, here on Substack.

The facts will always quite simply, speak for themselves. That is journalism.

O’Doherty takes issue with the fact I have written for Gript.ie, the Irish Sun, the Irish Mirror, the Irish Times, Irish Independent, Irish Examiner and others. I am a journalist. I have no affiliation to any outlet. I aim to reach a diverse audience. I have repeatedly spoken about and written of the fact that vaccine safety and vaccine injuries are no-go topics in the mainstream press. I do not know why that is. I have had contact with multiple editors of national newspapers in pitching stories on these topics - to no avail. I do not hold blame, judgement or derision for editors over these actions. I simply move on and continue my efforts, each time, with renewed determination.

I have had conversations with John McGuirk, editor of Gript.ie on the topic of vaccine injuries and inquests. I asked Gript for support in these investigations. He was not interested in supporting this work. I accepted that, without judgement and moved forward to tackle the topic alone.

I have not fallen out with any editor - nor any individual in fact - throughout the past three years, though I have had plenty of disagreements.

I do not burn bridges, I do not see the point.

We are all human, none of us perfect, simply making our way in this world.

*Continued gratitude to those that support my work: Option to ‘Buy a Coffee’ here